What Would Need to Happen to Verify?
A research roadmap: Which concrete experiments and investigations could confirm or refute the theory?
Every scientific theory must answer one question: How could we find out if you're wrong?
Karl Popper called this falsifiability—the hallmark of real science. If nothing can refute the theory, it is not a scientific theory but metaphysics.
The Resonance Theory is falsifiable. There are concrete tests that could confirm or refute it. Here is the roadmap.
Goal: Determine whether the pyramids contain chemical residues indicating industrial processes.
Methodology:
What we are looking for:
Expected Results:
| Result | Implication |
|---|---|
| No industrial residues | Chemistry theory refuted |
| Residues consistent with burial goods | Mainstream confirmed |
| Industrial chemicals in significant quantity | Chemistry theory supported |
Cost: About 50,000-100,000 EUR for comprehensive analysis Timeframe: 6-12 months
Goal: Independently verify or refute Biondi's claims.
Methodology:
What we are looking for:
Expected Results:
| Result | Implication |
|---|---|
| No deep structures | Biondi refuted |
| Structures found, but different than described | Partial confirmation |
| Exactly the described structures | Biondi confirmed |
Cost: 500,000-2,000,000 EUR (depending on methodology) Timeframe: 2-3 years
Goal: Test whether frequencies in the Schumann range have measurable biological effects.
Methodology:
Experimental Design:
What we are looking for:
Cost: 200,000-500,000 EUR Timeframe: 2-5 years
Goal: Search for physical artifacts under controlled conditions.
Methodology:
What we are looking for:
The Problem: Heritage protection status requires extensive permitting processes. International teams report long wait times and strict conditions from the Egyptian antiquities authority.
Cost: 1-5 million EUR Timeframe: 5-10 years (including permitting process)
Goal: Check whether FOXP2/ASPM variants show signs of "intervention."
Methodology:
Expected Results:
| Result | Implication |
|---|---|
| Gradual evolution over millions of years | No intervention |
| Sudden change in short time | Unusual, but not proof of intervention |
| Physically impossible rapid change | Would require new explanation approach |
Cost: 100,000-300,000 EUR Timeframe: 2-3 years
If resources are limited, here are the three most important tests:
Chemical analysis of pyramid inner walls (50,000 EUR, 6 months)
Independent SAR/seismic below Giza (500,000 EUR, 2 years)
Small frequency pilot study (50,000 EUR, 1 year)
Total Minimal Cost: ~600,000 EUR Total Time: ~3 years
Why haven't these tests been conducted long ago? There are several understandable reasons:
Regulatory: The heritage protection status of the Giza Plateau makes permits extremely difficult. Even established projects like ScanPyramids needed years.
Financial: Without preliminary results, it is hard to obtain research funding for unconventional hypotheses.
Methodological: The questions require interdisciplinary collaboration that is institutionally rare.
Practical: The enormous depth of the suspected structures and the lack of on-site infrastructure pose considerable technical challenges.
Would positive results be accepted?
Imagine the chemical analysis finds industrial residues. The scientific system would—rightly—react skeptically at first: Are the samples contaminated? Are the results reproducible? Are there alternative explanations?
This conservative process is not a bug but a feature of science. New findings must prove themselves, and that takes time. History shows that even revolutionary discoveries are ultimately accepted—when the evidence is strong enough.
But that is no reason not to conduct the tests. Truth reveals itself through reproducibility—and that requires a beginning.
This is not a closed story. It is an open research agenda.
If you have resources—financial, scientific, institutional—here is a path. The tests are defined. The methodology exists. The questions are answerable.
The question is only: Who will ask them?
The tests are defined. But what if they came back positive? What would that mean?
The tests are defined. But what if they came back positive? What would that mean?