Welcome to the Resonance Archive
A scientific-speculative project about alternative theories on the Egyptian pyramids
What is the Resonance Archive?
The Resonance Archive is a collection of fascinating theories about the Egyptian pyramids, frequencies and cosmic cycles. We examine hypotheses claiming that the pyramids were not just tombs, but possibly served as acoustic amplifiers, energy generators or part of a global network.
Every claim is carefully categorized: What is scientifically proven? What is logically plausible but unproven? And what belongs to the realm of speculation? This clear distinction sets us apart from esoteric blogs and sensationalist YouTube channels.
Our goal is intellectual honesty. We find these theories fascinating enough to take seriously - but not so uncritically as to believe everything. The Resonance Archive is an invitation to think, not to blind faith.
Who is this for?
- Curious minds with open heads –People who are ready to explore unconventional ideas without turning off their critical thinking.
- Skeptics seeking fair representation –We don't hide counterarguments. Chapter 7 is explicitly dedicated to criticism of these theories.
- No prior knowledge needed –Everything is explained from the ground up. Technical terms are explained in the glossary.
How to best read it?
Recommendation: Linear from Chapter 1 to 8. The chapters build on each other. Chapter 1 lays the foundation with the etymological connection between Egypt and alchemy. Chapter 2 introduces the frequency hypothesis. And so on.
Deep Dives are optional deep dives for those particularly interested. They contain more detailed analyses, additional sources and technical details.
The Glossary explains all technical terms - from "Schumann Resonance" to "Precession". Unknown terms are linked in the text.
What do the badges mean?
Left to right: decreasing scientific certainty
Scientifically confirmed. These facts are supported by peer-reviewed studies or established research.
Logically consistent but unproven. The theory does not contradict known facts but is not verified.
Interesting hypothesis without evidence. Fascinating to think about, but not to be treated as fact.
Scientifically refuted. No evidence supports this claim, or it has been actively falsified.
Ready for the journey? Begin with the question of why the science of transformation was named after Egypt.