Biondi's Discovery

The Man

Filippo Biondi is no charlatan. [Filippo Biondi - MDPI Remote Sensing 2022]

Biondi is a real scientist with real qualifications in a real field. This makes his claims harder to ignore - and harder to accept.

The Claims

Between 2022-2026, Biondi presented the following discoveries:

The satellite systems according to Biondi: Umbra Space, Capella Space, ICEYE, Cosmo-SkyMed.

The claimed validation: Gran Sasso Laboratory (LNGS) in Italy.

The Physical Question

This is where the problem begins. [Dr. Lawrence Conyers - Criticism]

SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) works by sending radar waves from a satellite and analyzing the reflected signal. The technology is proven for:

• Terrain mapping
• Movement measurement (subsidence, earthquakes)
• Structure detection under vegetation

The problem: Radar waves do not penetrate deeply into dense rock.

Biondi's claim: 600 meters.

That is 40 times deeper than the known physical limit.

The Critics

The opponents have names, faces, and concrete arguments. They deserve to be heard:

Snopes Rating: FALSE (based on physical objections) [Snopes Fact-Check 2025]

The Supporters

Joe Rogan Podcast Reach: Millions of listeners worldwide [Joe Rogan Experience #2443]

Legitimate Publications: Biondi has genuine papers in genuine journals (MDPI Remote Sensing)

Gran Sasso Claim: If the LNGS actually validated his methodology, that would be significant - but this validation was never independently confirmed.

The Problematic Co-Author

Another factor: Corrado Malanga, who appears as co-author of Biondi's pyramid research.

Malanga's other publications include books on:

• "Alien Abductions"
• "Transdimensional Parasites"
• "Soul-Mapping"

This does not automatically disqualify Biondi's research, but it is a warning sign. Serious scientists choose their co-authors carefully.

The Honest Assessment

The pattern is familiar and suspicious:

1. Extraordinary claims (600m deep structures)
2. Missing peer-review (core claims never in scientific journal)
3. Presentation in popular media (press conference, podcast)
4. Controversial associations (co-author with questionable background)

Simultaneously:

1. Biondi is no layperson (genuine qualifications, genuine publications)
2. The claims are not refuted (only physically questionable)
3. Unknown structures exist beneath Giza (other studies confirmed hollow spaces)

The Resonance Calculation

Let's assume for a moment that the 80-meter chambers exist. What would that mean?

Acoustic fundamental resonance of an 80m chamber:

f = Sound Speed / (2 x Length)
f = 343 m/s / (2 x 80 m)
f = 2.14 Hz

The harmonics:

What We Need

To confirm or refute Biondi's claims, we would need:

1. Peer-review of his SAR methodology by independent experts
2. Replication by other teams with different instruments
3. Physical confirmation through drilling or other on-site measurements
4. Transparency about the Gran Sasso validation

Until then, the status remains: SPECULATIVE - Extraordinary claims that require extraordinary evidence, which so far have not been provided.